That's a good question. We could have a policy that we create a tag of the test tree every time we create a tag of the openlaszlo trunk... but then why not just leave the test tree in the OpenLaszlo source tree?
On May 15, 2006, at 2:05 PM, P T Withington wrote: > I don't like having them in the tree, but if you move them out, how > do you handle the case of a test that becomes invalid because an > API changes? Do you then move it to the version that it applies to > and take it out of the general place? > > On 2006-05-15, at 16:47 EDT, Jim Grandy wrote: > >> A question for the community: >> >> Should we store regression tests in the OpenLaszlo source tree? >> Arguably they should not be locked to any given version/branch of >> OpenLaszlo, and they add overhead (20%) to each OL source tree. Not a >> problem for the repository itself (Subversion and Perforce both have >> efficient branching), but a problem for folks who need to have >> multiple source trees on their machine. >> >> The alternative would be to move them into a new repository >> structure, say >> >> svn.openlaszlo.org/tests/bugs >> >> Unit tests and other non-regression (whitebox) tests arguably should >> be kept with specific source trees, because they do change as the >> code changes. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> jim >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
