Please file a bug against the docs. In the odd case where I'm right and the code is wrong, I will be happy to pass it on to a developer. Usually the docs are wrong, alas.
Thanks, jrs On May 16, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Philip Romanik wrote: > Hi Amy, > > Thanks for the unit test references. > > Do you want me to write the test without fixing the issues in > LzAnimator? > For example, if you change the motion multiple times you can find > yourself > with a motion that doesn't match any of the fixed motions. Do you want > me > to create bug reports for issues that I find? > > Should I follow or ignore the existing documentation when writing the > unit > test? The docs indicate you can do certain things that the class does > not > allow. > > Thanks! > > Phil > > >> Task 3 >> Once this is taken care of, then don't proceed with smokecheck.lzx. >> Instead, please go back to the animator files (lzAnimator, >> lzAnimatorGroup), and finish their unit tests and merge them. There >> are some old unit tests for these in the test/lfc/animators dir that >> may or may not be useful. Also, there is another file test/lfc/ >> testanim.lzx, which may be useful. Certainly these unit tests are old >> enough that they won't run in the unit test framework that you are >> writing the current ones to support. > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
