This should work, but personally I'd like to eliminate these special
cases. I think that these were done in an attempt to speed up start
up (by avoiding our slow runtime callInherited mechanism), but this
should not be necessary any more because the runtime mechanism is
quite a bit more efficient (it does not have to loop through the
class heirarrchy).
On 2006-05-16, at 22:21 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
> The code at the start of LaszloView.as does a manual call to
> "super" as
> follows below.
> Should this just be expected to work with the new class substrate?
> Seems
> like it ought to
> work OK... I'm just doing testing now with a doppelganger LzView
> class.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> var LzView = Class( "LzView" , LzNode );
>
> LzView.prototype._nodeconstruct = LzNode.prototype.construct;
> //--------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> //Base level constructor for views. See <method
> //classname="LzNode">construct</method> for more on this.
> //
> // @keywords protected
> //--------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> LzView.prototype.construct = function ( parent , args ) {
> //this.callInherited( "construct" , arguments.callee ,
> parent ,args );
> this._nodeconstruct( parent ? parent : canvas, args );
>
>
>
> --
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
