It's in trunk, revision 979. -Max
Jim Grandy wrote: > On further reflection, I think the best thing would be if you checked > into svn trunk or svn branches/3.3. I'll migrate from there. > > I guess I no longer think anyone should be checking into lps-dev, or > directly into lps-3.3. Too much opportunity for confusion. Let's > develop in svn and I'll hand migrate to p4. > > jim > > On Jun 14, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Max Carlson wrote: > >> It can happen when a view is data bound and gets recycled. Its loader >> can be in use when the second setSource call happens. I was able to >> leak connections with only 3 views making two setSource calls back- >> to-back. >> >> Jim, can you give me rights or whatever I need to check this into >> trunk? >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Max Carlson >> OpenLaszlo.org >> >> >> P T Withington wrote: >>> . I'd be interested to know how a request that is already in >>> progress gets >>> made again. This is another rat's nest that needs to be rethought. >>> >>> Approved. >>> >>> On 2006-06-14, at 01:16 EDT, Max Carlson wrote: >>> >>>> This should resolve >>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-2131?page=all - please >>>> apply >>>> the attached patch inside trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/. Let me know >>>> how it >>>> goes! >>>> >>>> --Regards, >>>> Max Carlson >>>> OpenLaszlo.org >>>> <patch.mcarlson.4076.tgz> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
