This was all in a misguided attempt to make it so that you could declare
dataset params in laszlo. I don't think anyone uses that feature. We
should deprecate or remove it.
A
On Jun 16, P T Withington wrote:
> I'm still stomping out __proto__'s from the LFC. The LzParam construct method
> creates a shadow hash for it's setters. Does it really need to do that? If
> so, can you explain why, so I can put a comment here?
>
> Index: LzParam.lzs
> ===================================================================
> --- LzParam.lzs (revision 1016)
> +++ LzParam.lzs (working copy)
> @@ -27,9 +27,10 @@
> //==============================================================================
> LzParam.prototype.construct = function ( parent , args ){
> super.construct( parent, args );
> - var mysetters ={};
> - mysetters.__proto__ = this.setters;
> - this.setters = mysetters;
> + // TODO: [2006-06-16 ptw] Do LzParam instances really need to have
> + // their own private setters? Or is this some holdover from the
> + // old class system?
> + this.setters = new LzInheritedHash(this.setters);
> // construct
> this.d = {};
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
