The bug describes this behavior as a regression relative to 3.3. However, we know that 3.3 itself contained a simplelayout regression. It would be useful to confirm that 3.2 and earlier behave the same as 3.3.1 -- then we could simply close this bug as Behaves Correctly.
In other words, we shouldn't strive to "improve" simplelayout beyond the 3.2 baseline. jim On Jun 19, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Philip Romanik wrote: > Hi Bret, > > You've described the problem being reported; hence the bug report. > Should radiogroup become smart enough to cancel it's own built-in > layout if the user manually specifies another one via <simplelayout>? > > Thanks! > > Phil > > > >> Hi Philip, >> >> Radiogroup has it's own simplelayout embedded within it. If you >> want to >> replace that layout , then you need assign a new layout via the " >> layout attribute" of radiogroup. Just adding a layout as a subnode >> causes problems. All layouts assigned to a view are active unless >> declared otherwise. When you see views laid out in a diagonal >> fashion it >> is usually symptomatic of two simplelayouts being assigned to a view, >> each with a different 'layout' axis. >> >> -Bret > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
