That sounds like a good idea to me. It certainly would unobfuscate things a bit.
Shall I assign http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-1326 to you? On 2006-06-23, at 17:31 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote: > Should we add a new arg that's passed in to the runtime? That is, > we now > pass in > a list of attributes, $events (handlers), and $refs (constraints). > Should we > also pass in something > which is the list of declared events, which should get initialized > to the > sentinel event? > > Maybe we should rename $refs to $constraints, and $events to > $eventhandlers,and add $events as the new > arg? > > > > On 6/23/06, Henry Minsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Yeah I think now would be better than later. >> A declared event needs to get initialized to something, and it has to >> happen pretty early. >> We're using the sentinel object now, there was some talk of making >> it so >> the compiler expanded >> sendEvent to do a check for null instead? I guess we can overlap >> these >> implementations, and if the >> compiler check is implemented then we could then just bind the >> sentinel >> object to null.. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Sounds like it should definitely be initialized to the sentinel >> > > array... >> > >> > As the TODO says, this is a fragile area of the tag compiler >> stemming >> > from treating an event declaration as an attribute declaration. It >> > might work to use the sentinel event instead of null, but >> perhaps we >> > want to consider if now is the time to split events from >> attributes? >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
