Put back notifyingEvent! A
On Jun 30, Max Carlson wrote: > FWIW this duplicates the current design (in SWF) which sends the onidle > event regardless of if there are listeners. > > What do you think is the best way to find out that someone has > registered for the event? I would just override Lzidle.addDelegate() to > turn the idle timer back on, but the event isn't created until the first > delegate is attached... > > -Max > > P T Withington wrote: > > Do we have a separate bug that LzIdle should clear the interval timer > > when there are no listeners? > > > > On 2006-06-30, at 00:50 EDT, Max Carlson wrote: > > > >> Summary: LzIdle uses setInterval() instead of a movieclip > >> > >> New Features: > >> > >> Bugs Fixed: LPP-2269 - LzIdle should use setInterval() instead of a > >> movieclip > >> > >> Technical Reviewer: jim > >> QA Reviewer: henry > >> Doc Reviewer: (pending) > >> > >> Documentation: > >> > >> Release Notes: > >> > >> Details: > >> > >> > >> Tests: > >> > >> Files: > >> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/services/LzIdle.as > >> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/SWFFile.java > >> --Regards, > >> Max Carlson > >> OpenLaszlo.org > >> <patch.mcarlson.1764.tgz> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Laszlo-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
