On 7/22/06, Max Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should we name it something similar to highlight the fact that it's a
subset of XHR? What are the differences?
-Max
Henry Minsky wrote:
> It doesn't quite match XMLHTTPRequest, so I'd rather not rename it
> until it's really the same.
>
> On 7/22/06, *Max Carlson* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> lfc/kernel/LzHTTPLoad.lzs makes sense. Shall we rename this to
> XMLHTTPRequest since it now emulates that API?
>
> -Max
>
> Henry Minsky wrote:
> >
> > I have some common code between two kernel implementations of the
> same
> > API, LzHTTPLoader.as and LzHTTPLoader.js . Where
> > should I put the common code? It's code that is portable so that
> would
> > put it someplace in the LFC, but it is used by kernel code.
> > I am not sure how to structure this -- the LHTTPLoader.as and .js
> files
> > define their own LzHTTPLoader objects and put methods
> > on them.
> >
> > I'm thinking that this code could go into lfc/kernel, and be
> #included
> > by the individual runtime files (lfc/kernel/swf/LzHTTPLoad.as, and
> > lfc/kernel/dhtml/LzHTTPLoader.js)
> >
> >
> > --
> > Henry Minsky
> > Software Architect
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
