Perhaps that argues for 2 spaces for .js/.lzs/.as files and 4 spaces  
for .lzx files...

On Jul 28, 2006, at 4:49 AM, P T Withington wrote:

> Yes, I have the design whitespace issue fairly well beaten into me by
> Neil.
>
> But is it true you can never have too much whitespace?  Why do we use
> only 4 spaces?  Why not 8, or 80?  I can see that 1 is not visually
> distinct, but in a fixed width font, 2 seems enough.  And if we
> enforce 80 cols, 4 can start to seem wasteful.  There are deeply
> nested blocks in the LFC where the lines get _very_ short because of
> the 4-space indent.
>
> Now that we are moving to class declarations, your function body
> starts out with 2 levels of indentation, add a little control flow,
> and before you know it, you have less than 50 chars left on your  
> line...
>
> On 2006-07-28, at 00:33 EDT, Sarah Allen wrote:
>
>> my $.02...
>>
>> I like 4 spaces, but maybe that's just because Adam insisted upon
>> in at the beginning of time and I've just gotten used to it.
>> Besides whitespace is nice, not wasteful -- ask any designer you  
>> know.
>>
>> I'm also for 80col -- I like having room for two pages side by side
>> on my wide screen.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Salama wrote:
>>
>>> I use Emacs to develop Laszlo apps and really like the automatic
>>> indentation I get when using nxml mode. I like the fact that line
>>> breaks are aligned after the tag name so all beginning attributes
>>> are aligned and that's usually after the 2nd column since tag
>>> names are themselves longer than 2 columns.
>>>
>>> I think 4 spaces is wasteful. I like 2 spaces. I also would like
>>> to limit page width to, at most, 80 cols. I don't care about the
>>> 1280. There is still a very large hacker community that sticks to
>>> the 80 cols because of compatibility across systems and editors.
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents :)
>>>
>>> - Daniel
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2006, at 1:50 PM, P T Withington wrote:
>>>
>>>> Scott, please explain yourself.  4 seems wasteful.
>>>>
>>>> Long lines are considered harmful, no matter how wide your average
>>>> screen.  Have you read the Times lately?
>>>>
>>>> On 2006-07-25, at 13:36 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 4! 4! 4!
>>>>> Which I only say after having Scott slap me around repeatedly for
>>>>> doing it wrong.
>>>>> I used to be into 3, myself.
>>>>> While we're at it, DARE WE come up with a line length recommended
>>>>> limit? Pablo uses
>>>>> 80 and maybe you hardcore oldskoolers do, but please, have you  
>>>>> seen
>>>>> the size of the standard screen lately? Show me a coder who  
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> have at least 1280 across and I'll show you... um.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:05 AM, P T Withington wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> After the 'grand class conversion', Phil and I plan to re-
>>>>>> indent the
>>>>>> LFC sources.  [Right now Phil is making the conversion trying to
>>>>>> minimize the whitespace changes to make it easy to review.
>>>>>> Once we
>>>>>> have tested and verified that it all works, we plan to re- 
>>>>>> indent.]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking over the LFC sources, we have some code that is
>>>>>> indented with
>>>>>> 4 spaces and some with 2.  Do we care?  My personal preference
>>>>>> is 2
>>>>>> -- it's enough to be visually distinct without being wasteful.  
>>>>>> But most of the sources (and apparently most editors) default to
>>>>>> 4.  We
>>>>>> have a change to make things uniform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vote your choice today!
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Laszlo-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> benjamin shine
>>>>> software engineer
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Laszlo-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Laszlo-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev

_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev

Reply via email to