tests/smoke/lzunit-test.lzx On 2006-07-31, at 13:17 EDT, Daniel Pool wrote:
> Knowing that code correctly fails is something I have wanted in our > own > test suite but didn't see how to add. Maybe I should know this already > but where is the code in smokecheck that is referred to below? > > Thanks, > Daniel. > > P T Withington wrote: >> FWIW, smokecheck tests lzunit before it uses it by setting up an >> error handler for failures and then tries a bunch of assertions that >> it expects to fail (and checks that the error handler gets called). >> If the expected failures do not fail, then that test fails. >> >> On 2006-07-28, at 17:04 EDT, Jim Grandy wrote: >> >>> I'd like to see us do #2. Ben, do you have thoughts on how we might >>> add intentional failures to lztest? I'm not volunteering you do it, >>> just seeking information :-) >>> >>> jim >>> >>> On Jul 28, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Philip Romanik wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Mamye, >>>> >>>> This is concerning the jira bug about the failing lztests, >>>> >>>> http://jira.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-2416 >>>> >>>> >>>> Two of the tests that are failing, lztest-animator.lzx and >>>> lztest-animatorgroup.lzx, fail because of bugs I found while >>>> writing the >>>> tests. Some later tests I wrote (on trunk) also generate errors but >>>> they >>>> reference a jira bug report. >>>> >>>> For the two tests that run on legals, I can do the following: >>>> >>>> 1. Do nothing. This means the unit tests will fail every time it is >>>> run. >>>> >>>> 2. Modify the test to reference the jira bug report. Presumably, >>>> the test >>>> framework will have to be extended to ignore the errors since they >>>> are >>>> known issues. The errors being reported are also present on trunk. >>>> >>>> 3. Comment out the tests that are failing. The unit test will pass. >>>> I doubt >>>> anyone would run into these issues in actual use. >>>> >>>> There is one test that occasionally fails. It times how long the >>>> animation >>>> actually takes and compares it an expected value. If the error >>>> exceeds a >>>> set tolerance, an error is generated. I can make the tolerance much >>>> larger >>>> but then the test becomes less useful. >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Laszlo-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Laszlo-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
