I'd prefer a compile-time warning. A runtime warning would require extra code to be emitted by the compiler just to generate the runtime warning. And a compile time warning would only interfere with development while we are bringing over lots of legacy sample apps, and I think we can handle seeing those.
jim On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Max Carlson wrote: > I vote for a runtime warning so it doesn't interfere with development. > > -Max > > Henry Minsky wrote: >> >> If an LZX app uses the <font> tag to import a font, and compile it >> for >> DHTML or other target which doesn't support >> font inclusion, should the compiler give a warning, or silently >> ignore >> the font tag? >> >> >> >> -- >> Henry Minsky >> Software Architect >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
