I vote to defer as well. Flash 7/8 is one of the few runtimes where it's often cheaper to fail silently than add testing overhead.
-Max P T Withington wrote: > I guess you don't _have_ to fix the swf kernel files, since we know they > work (and there should be no warnings in the dhtml kernel). > > I wonder what Max (cc-ed) thinks. > > I would vote to defer the warning scrub on the swf kernel. You could > put the swf kernel references inside a #pragma block to silence the > warnings they are generating. > > On 2006-08-22, at 14:18 EDT, Philip Romanik wrote: > >> Hi Tucker, >> >> I found the old changes I made (they are in p4 on lps-legals) and >> applied as many of them as I could. When I ran simple.lzx, I see a lot >> of warnings coming from the kernel. I'm building for swf at the >> moment. Should I stay away from touching the kernel files? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Phil >> > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
