Benjamin Shine wrote: > Okay, that was predictable... My prefetch changes indeed broke the > build. They should not go into PR3, and we should defer bug LPP-2542 > to 3.4. Just scheduled another nightly build of trunk for a few > minutes from now, with prefetch turned back off. > > To actually do prefetching for 3.4, I need to think about it all a > bit more, vis a vis building installers on mac and windows; they > should have the prefetched stuff too. Can I rsync the cache from > linux-builder onto windows-builder and mac-builder, so I don't have > to actually run the prefetches on all 3 archs? > > ...which brings up the idea of only doing most of the build on linux, > and pushing java build products onto the windows and mac builder, > which I should have done a long time ago, but didn't. So if I'm going > to rsync the cache, I might as well rsync the jar and docs too.
So... One of the benefits of the prefetch on all platforms is that we know that it works. We've gone back and forth on this a number of times and we keep coming back to the build being our "canary in the mine". I'll argue for separate builds, but doing it on faster systems. ~md > > Defer to 3.4, yeah. > > -ben > > On Aug 27, 2006, at 7:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> FAILURE: build failed for 1679-openlaszlo-trunk at Sun Aug 27 >> 19:12:14 PDT 2006 attaching /home/svnbuild/logs/tail-1679-trunk- >> nightly.log >> <tail-1679-trunk-nightly.log> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-builds mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-builds > > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
