I agree with Tucker, please don't cut corners here. I agree that this is fundamental, and important to get right in the first release. (There are enough incompatible CSS implementations out there, let's not add to the noise!)
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:23 PM, P T Withington wrote: > I would not. It seems like a fairly fundamental thing in CSS. Your > 'a c' 'b c' example is exactly this case. > > Why can't you just assign a sequence number to each rule as you > encounter it and use the sequence number to break ties? > > On 2006-09-11, at 18:00 EDT, Adam Wolff wrote: > >> The CSS spec says this: >> "Finally, sort by order specified: if two declarations have the same >> weight, origin and specificity, the latter specified wins." >> >> This is hard for us because of optimizations we make. Do you think >> we can >> punt on this, at least for now? >> >> A >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
