Max, it looks like this didn't get checked in. Can you please check it in?
On Sep 21, 2006, at 3:11 PM, P T Withington wrote: > Approved, if you will file a bug (and add a comment referencing the > bug) regarding layout class being the string 'null'. I suspect a bug > in the tag compiler is the root cause. If there were a small test > case that we could 'lzc --script' we could see if that were so. What > was the source that was tickling that bug? Can we boil it down to a > test case? > > On 2006-09-20, at 02:42 EDT, Max Carlson wrote: > >> Change change.SV2sD4VYi.txt by [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> computer.local /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/legals/ on 2006-09-19 >> 23:31:48 PDT >> >> Summary: Fix explore-nav.lzx in dhtml. >> >> New Features: >> >> Bugs Fixed: >> >> Technical Reviewer: ptw >> QA Reviewer: promanik >> Doc Reviewer: (pending) >> >> Documentation: >> >> Release Notes: >> >> Details: I'm not sure all of these changes should be necessary, in >> particular the test for this.p in LzDatapointer.lzs - shouldn't >> this.p always be set? Also, it's strange that I have to test for >> the string version of 'null' in LaszloView.lzs. The LzDatapointer >> and LzNode changes feel like the problems I was seeing with data >> after r1857. Please investigate! >> >> >> Tests: http://localhost:8080/legals/laszlo-explorer/explore-nav.lzx? >> lzr=dhtml runs! >> >> Files: >> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/core/LzNode.lzs >> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LaszloView.lzs >> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/data/LzDatapointer.lzs >> >> <patch.maxcarlson.iSVf.tgz> > > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
