I believe I listed the two places in the documentation that would have to change in my original description.
On 2006-09-27, at 13:15 EDT, John Sundman wrote: > I agree that this would be welcome, but it is a big change. Very > big. > > jrs > > On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:07 PM, David Temkin wrote: > >>> >>> This proposal will also fix the long-standing issue that the >>> built-in >>> tags are implemented by classes whose name does not correspond to >>> the >>> tag name. Under this proposal, all dynamic instantiation of tag >>> classes will be by tag name, so that issue goes away. >> >> >> Now this I like! For exactly the reason stated above -- clarity of >> mapping between tags and classes. > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
