A side question: does getAttributeRelative understand the difference  
between x,y and width,height, where the first two are affected by  
scaling, rotation & translation but the second two are only affected  
by scaling?

jim

On Oct 10, 2006, at 7:09 AM, Max Carlson wrote:

> What Tucker said is correct.  And yes, in DHTML we could scale inner
> view resources but not text.  There's a warning for now.  Thanks Phil!
>
> -Max
>
> P T Withington wrote:
>> We want what you implemented.  These are the LZX semantics and the
>> correct answer.  It is a bug in the DHTML implementation that inner
>> views are not scaled.  You will get a warning to that effect in the
>> current implementation.  [It is my contention that we could use the
>> portable linkage implementation to correctly scale inner views.]
>>
>> On 2006-10-10, at 09:16 EDT, Philip Romanik wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Max,
>>>
>>> The change I made moves getAttributeRelative() from LzSprite to  
>>> LzView
>>> because there is no width/height support in the dhtml version.  
>>> Example
>>> apps such as calendar call getAttributeRelative() with
>>> x,y,width,height. It sounds like there are two choices when someone
>>> asks for width/height from dhtml:
>>>
>>>   - Return the view's width/height.
>>>   - Return the same (scaled) width/height for dhtml and swf.
>>>
>>> My change is doing the latter. Is the first choice more consistent?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> 2) As with .as, I don't think there needs to be any sprite
>>>>> getAttributeRelative.  The portable code already maintains  
>>>>> accurate
>>>> view
>>>>> dimensions.  [Max: please verify.]
>>>>
>>>> Right, except getAttributeRelative() works with height and width  
>>>> in .as,
>>>> but not .js.  This shouldn't be a problem, since width and  
>>>> height can't
>>>> be transformed/scaled for subviews in .js.  The API needs to be
>>>> consistent and should return something sensible for width/height
>>>> though...
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev


_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev

Reply via email to