I just ran across test/performance and components/utils/performance.
This
http://localhost:8080/legals/test/performance/adding-elements-to-
array.lzx?debug=true
gives
empty : 0.87us ± 0.02 [0.84..0.95]/100
Array.push : 3.89us ± 1.39 [3.66..17.63]/100
Array[Array.length] = : 3.47us ± 0.06 [3.40..3.70]/100
Array[index] = : 2.41us ± 0.04 [2.35..2.53]/100
Array[index] = (preallocated) : 2.46us ± 0.06 [2.38..2.80]/100
Object[key] = : 2.83us ± 5.14 [2.26..53.75]/100
Seems to work in dhtml, too. Darn it's nice -- any reason components/
utils/performance/measure.lzx shouldn't be the basis for our updated
performance benchmarks?
We need a way to track the results in different versions & runtimes
of course. Someone's going to say "how about the wiki?" in response
to which I am going to shoot myself. XML checked into the source tree
would work better, I think... and if Josh Crowley stays up late he
could write a charting app to visualize the performance results. (Not
that Josh Crowley would ever stay up late.)
-ben
On Oct 17, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Max Carlson wrote:
Yes it does.
-Max
Henry Minsky wrote:
Does the getTimer() value that is sent in LzIdle events start from
zero when the LFC is loaded?
On 10/16/06, *Henry Minsky* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
At the bug scrub we talked about getting some updated performance
benchmarks , are these assigned with some high priorty?
There's a number of proposed optimizations that are in JIRA which
would be easier to attack if we had a simple set of metrics we
could run. A couple of issues involve app startup time, is that
adequately covered by the existing inittimer tag ? --
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Benjamin Shine
Software Engineer, Open Laszlo / Laszlo Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
