This is listed in our list of test paths for lzunit test/lzunit/testpaths.txt, but it fails
http://localhost:8080/legals/test/components/base/lzunit-basetabs.lzx?lzr=swf7
Tests: 6 Failures: 3 Errors: 0
TestFailure: Object >>> testTabClassInherited failed: Equals: expected "ptab" got "Object"
TestFailure: Object >>> testTabClassImplicit failed: Equals: expected "tab" got "Object"
TestFailure: Object >>> testTabClassDirect failed: Equals: expected "ptab" got "Object"
Does this ring a bell for anyone?
The assertions are
<method name="testTabClassImplicit">
assertEquals('tab', tabs0.bar.subviews[0].classname);
</method>
<method name="testTabClassDirect">
assertEquals('ptab', tabs1.bar.subviews[0].classname);
</method>
<method name="testTabClassInherited">
assertEquals('ptab', tabs2.bar.subviews[0].classname);
</method>
Is this no longer a valid way to ask for the class name?
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [Laszlo-dev] Anyone know anything about this unit test? lzu... Henry Minsky
- Re: [Laszlo-dev] Anyone know anything about this unit ... P T Withington
- Re: [Laszlo-dev] Anyone know anything about this u... John Sundman
- Re: [Laszlo-dev] Anyone know anything about th... Henry Minsky
- [Laszlo-dev] Adobe and Mozilla Foundation Collaborate ... Don Hopkins
