Are you sure? That change shouldn't have affected the lfc or
anything. It just properly turns off the refguide build!
jgrandy-pb:~/dev/svn/openlaszlo/branches/legals jgrandyw$ svn diff -r
2989
Index: docs/src/build.xml
===================================================================
--- docs/src/build.xml (revision 2989)
+++ docs/src/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -192,11 +192,17 @@
<target name="lfc.dbk.dep">
<!-- essentially a copy of the same target in ${lfc.dir}/
build.xml, but I'm
not sure what else to do -->
- <uptodate property="lfc.dbk.uptodate" targetfile="$
{lfc.dbk.dir}/
LaszloLibrary.dbk">
- <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.lzs" />
- <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.as" />
- <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.js" />
- </uptodate>
+ <echo message="skip.doc.reference is ${skip.doc.reference}"/>
+ <condition property="lfc.dbk.uptodate">
+ <or>
+ <isset property="skip.doc.reference"/>
+ <uptodate targetfile="${lfc.dbk.dir}/LaszloLibrary.dbk">
+ <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.lzs" />
+ <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.as" />
+ <srcfiles dir="${lfc.dir}" includes="**/*.js" />
+ </uptodate>
+ </or>
+ </condition>
</target>
<target name="reference" description="Build the reference"
Index: build-tools/build-opt.xml
===================================================================
--- build-tools/build-opt.xml (revision 2989)
+++ build-tools/build-opt.xml (working copy)
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
<property name="skip.prefetch" value="true" />
<!-- property name="skip.wrappertest" value="true" -->
<!-- <property name="skip.runlzunit" value="true" -->
- <property name="skip.doc.reference" value="true" />
+<?ignore <property name="skip.doc.reference" value="true" /> ?>
<property name="done.build-opt" value="true" />
</target>
jim
On Dec 9, 2006, at 3:31 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> Gah!
>
> On 2006-12-09, at 18:07 EST, Philip Romanik wrote:
>
>> The error is coming from 2989, one of Jim's comment-change
updates.
>>
>> 2988 doesn't show the error, and 2989 does.
>>
>>
>>> I did a clean checkout/build and got the same behavior. Must be a
>>> Windows
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> >Weird. I am not seeing it in my playpen.
>>> >
>>> >On 2006-12-09, at 16:22 EST, Philip Romanik wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Tucker,
>>> > >
>>> > > I applied both and they don't address this issue. I'll see if
>>> I can
>>> > > narrow the problem down a bit. These problems crept in during
>>> the
>>> > > past couple of days.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Phil
>>> > >
>>
>