Do we have the equivalent of a /tmp scratch directory in the lps server
directory? If not, where would be the best place to put it? lps/tmp?


On 1/3/07, Mamye Kratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I noticed the solo-deploy.zip is being stored in C:\Program
Files\OpenLaszlo
Server 4.0b1rc1\Server\lps-4.0b1rc1\lps\admin\. I guess that would explain
the contents of the zip file.

Mamye

----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Henry Minsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "OpenLaszlo development list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Laszlo-dev] Reply to post 'Beta1: exception report, DHTML
Deploy > SOLO'


> It seems sensible to me - why not time/datestamp each file?  Developers
> may want to keep multiple SOLO versions anyway...
>
> -Max
>
> Henry Minsky wrote:
>> Our QA person got her machine into a state which is what you described,
>> of
>> files not getting into the
>> zip archive. Maybe I had better try creating a new unique filename for
>> the
>> zip archive each time instead of
>> trying to reuse the file, maybe the file I/O calls are getting screwed
up
>> with stale directory information cached
>> someplace in the Java VM?
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/07, DL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3 Jan 2007 at 17:31, Henry Minsky wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hmm that is weird. Are you sure you don't have two different
instances
>>> > of the LPS server running, and maybe you are running from a
different
>>> > one than you think you are? I made that mistake about twice already,
>>> > between 4.0b1 and legals servlets on my machine.
>>>
>>> I have openlaszlo-3.3.3 and openlaszlo-4.0 as separate running webapps
>>> in
>>> tomcat server.
>>>
>>> But I'm fairly sure the problem is in openlaszlo-4.0 (beta1) since the
>>> text file which coexisted
>>> with copy-of-hello.lzx was produced only in that webapp.
>>>
>>> I'll apply some more tests to pin it down.
>>>
>>> DL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Max Carlson
> OpenLaszlo.org
>




--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to