Wouldn't <script href=""> be more descriptive, and more in line with
what other markup languages do?
On Jan 16, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Henry Minsky wrote:
There's some code which Pablo wrote for the RPC libraries which
basically just wants to include
straight javascript code, in the same way that the LFC is written.
He had to wrap these files in <library><script> tags to get them to
work with <include> in LZX.
I propose an option to <include> which is a "type=script"
attribute. If the tag compiler encounters this, it
will just inline the contents of the included file directly at the
top level, just like LFC code.
So the library code which declares the <javarpc> class would say,
for example
javarpc.lzx:
<library>
<include href="rpc/rpc.lzx" />
<include href="rpc/library/javarpc.js" type="script" />
And the javarpc.js file is straight javascript.
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
