Yeah the behavior now matches what is in trunk, I will revert the test to expect that.
On 1/19/07, P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This could just mean reverting the test to the previous version. The last round of event deferral changes may have made it so the old initialization order is preserved now (I don't think that test tests the case of an init arg triggering a method on the object under initialization). On 2007-01-19, at 17:38 EST, Henry Minsky wrote: > okay I will take a look > > > On 1/19/07, Benjamin Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> The smokecheck fails, but this time farther in than before -- in >> fact, it's failed here before, in lztest-node-initsequence.lzx. This >> would seem to fit in with Henry and Tucker's re-re-re-changing the >> event system... but it was Henry's bug before, so, Henry, bounceback >> to you! >> >> http://localhost:8080/legals/test/lztest/lztest-node- >> initsequence.lzx? >> lzr=swf7 >> >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-3261 >> > > > > -- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Henry Minsky Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
