On 2007-02-07, at 11:16 EST, Jim Grandy wrote:

On Feb 7, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Adam Wolff wrote:
diamond relies on the behavior where if I don't specify a file name
for a directory in an include, it looks for the library.lzx file in that
directory. e.g.

    <include href="foo/bar"/>

Actually includes
    foo/bar/library.lzx


Is this documented behavior? The comments at the top of lps/ components/library.lzx &co. suggest these files are only used by the documentation generator. Assuming that is true, I've been modifying the library.lzx files in the components to suit the refguide.

I don't know where it is documented, but the compiler will definitely implicitly add library.lzx to a directory in an include (and has done so for as long as I can remember).

The binary library changes make the compiler search for library.lzo before loading library.lzx.

It is _supposed_ to be the case that if your library contains auto- includes, and you binary compile your library, the auto-includes will _not_ be included in the binary, but will be auto-loaded when you load your library (trying to mimic as much as possible the normal library behavior).

Pablo's test reveals another screw-case that is not handled: You include a library and elsewhere in your program also a sub-library of that library. Then you binary-compile the library. The binary library gets loaded, but the compiler does not realize that that implies the sub-library is also loaded, so it tries to re-load the sub-library and creates duplicate definition warnings. I will have to add some annotation to binary libraries to note all the sub- libraries that comprise the library. [er, Mr. Strunk, did I use that word correctly? I've always wanted to find a use for it.]

Reply via email to