I'm going to try to compile an LFC without the fscommand calls, just to see
if that makes any difference. Otherwise yes, we can run our script compiler
on a smaller block of code and send it to you.

On 2/7/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

AFAIK, the "flag" of getURL2 tag is just an 8bit number, dunno
how can flasm report 0x497 and 0x4a3 there..
Can you provide a simpler SWF to avoid problems related to
out of sync stream ?

--strk;


On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:36:59PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote:
> Hmm, those instructions seem to be what "fscommand" is getting compiled
to,
> the code generator says
>
>        if ("fscommand".equals(name) && arglen == 2) {
>          assert args[0] instanceof ASTLiteral;
>          Object v = translateLiteralNode(args[0]);
>          assert v instanceof String;
>          collector.push("FSCommand:" + v);
>          visitExpression(args[1]);
>          collector.emit(Instructions.GetURL2);
>          return true;
>        }
>
> Tucker, Max, what's the story with that? Why does fscommand equate to a
> GetURL2 tag?
>
>
> On 2/7/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:27:46PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >> What error are you seeing from Flasm? The only warning I see is that
it
> >> complains about getURL2 not being a known tag, which I figured was
just
> >due
> >> to flasm being out of date, not due to a alignment error.
> >
> >Same here:
> >
> >Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x0
> >Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x497
> >Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x4a3
> >Unknown getURL2 flag: 0x0
> >
> >Do those flags actually make sense ?
> >Also, I see many calls to Object.addProperty() with only 2 args, which
> >seem
> >invalid to me. Are them intentional, and are they known to work ? How ?
> >
> >--strk;
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/7/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Sorry, stripped you from the recipients list.
> >> >
> >> >----- Forwarded message from strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
> >> >
> >> >Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:34:45 +0100
> >> >From: strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Subject: Re: [Laszlo-dev] [Gnash-dev] YouTube video via OpenLaszlo
> >> >To: gnash-dev Mailing List <[email protected]>
> >> >X-BeenThere: [email protected]
> >> >
> >> >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:12:36AM -0500, P T Withington wrote:
> >> >> Does the file flasm? Or does flasm complain too?
> >> >
> >> >flasm complains too. And Ming as well.
> >> >I just committed a patch that seems to survive that malformation,
but
> >> >other problems occur so o I'm not sure about the fix. The best way
> >> >to verify would be producing a much simpler SWF.
> >> >
> >> >BTW, the other problems seem to be in DEFINESHAPE3 handling.
> >> >There is actually NO difference from DEFINESHAPE2 in the way Gnash
> >handles
> >> >it
> >> >so it's surely a Gnash problem. If you can provide a simple SWF (a
> >single
> >> >shape)
> >> >compiled in SWF6 and SWF7 ((or whatever SWF version instruduced
> >> >DEFINESHAPE3) that might
> >> >help tracking differences.
> >> >
> >> >--strk;
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2007-02-06, at 21:44 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On the file I sent you, can you figure out which instruction it
> >> >> >what choking
> >> >> >on (i.e., the byte offset into the uncompressed swf file?). I can
> >> >> >send you
> >> >> >an uncompressed swf if that would make it easier.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 2/6/07, Rob Savoye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Henry Minsky wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>  On every single one of them I get this error still:
> >> >> >>> 17:30:50: ERROR: swf_event::read(), event_length = 111, but
read
> >> >> >>110
> >> >> >>So then nothing else gets parsed right, so we'll have to look
into
> >> >> >>it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>        - rob -
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >Henry Minsky
> >> >> >Software Architect
> >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Gnash-dev mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> >> >/\   Keep it simple!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Gnash-dev mailing list
> >> >[email protected]
> >> >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
> >> >
> >> >----- End forwarded message -----
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> >> >/\   Keep it simple!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Henry Minsky
> >> Software Architect
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >--
> >
> >()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> >/\   Keep it simple!
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\   Keep it simple!




--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to