I might've converted this wrong when I updated to use the new class system.
On 3/23/07, Pablo Kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops. Thanks, Tucker. :) On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, P T Withington wrote: > I posted what may be a work-around. > > It looks like this mistakenly was spec-ed as an instance function and > should be a class (static) instead (and the encoder would have to be > fixed too). > > Seems to me the encoder should be using `instanceof` not comparing > prototypes. Not all javascripts support __proto__. (It never > occured to me that we had components that tried to do __proto__ > hacking!) > > And, I wonder if Double should be a subclass of Number? (Not sure > that will work in JS1.) > > On 2007-03-23, at 09:02 EDT, Max Carlson wrote: > > > http://forum.openlaszlo.org/showthread.php?t=8757 > > > > Do we have a testcase that verifies DoubleWrapper works properly? > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Max Carlson > > OpenLaszlo.org > > > >
-- Henry Minsky Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
