Questions:
1. Should there be an abstract `dataprovider` class?
2. If we had a dataprovider class, we could avoid global pollution by
having defaultdataprovider be a property of that.
3. I don't recall `abortLoadForRequest` being part of the
dataprovider API, did I miss that?
On 2007-08-03, at 17:08 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
This is a first cut at an implementation of the datarequest/
dataprovider API
that implements lzhttpdataprovider, and modifies lzdataset to use
this api.
Change 20070803-hqm-0 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007-08-03 16:57:12
EDT
in /cygdrive/c/users/hqm/openlaszlo/wafflecone/WEB-INF/lps/lfc
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/wafflecone/
WEB-INF/lps/lfc
Summary: preliminary implementation of dataprovider API
New Features:
Bugs Fixed: LPP-4404
Technical Reviewer: pkang, ptw (pending)
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: (pending)
Documentation:
Release Notes:
Details:
implements lzhttpdataprovider, lzhttpdatarequest, modifies lzdataset
to use the new API
Tests:
test/lfc/data/alldata.lzx
[tests which refer to proxied response headers are failing currently]
Files:
M kernel/swf/LzLoadQueue.as
M kernel/swf/LzHTTPLoader.as
M kernel/dhtml/LzHTTPLoader.js
A data/LzDataRequest.lzs
M data/LzDataElement.lzs
A data/LzHTTPDataProvider.lzs
M data/LzDataset.lzs
M data/Library.lzs
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20070803-
hqm-0.tar
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
