Hi Tucker, I'm going to wait. Besides, Amy told me to.
Thanks! Phil
That sound right. If you wanted to move forward on this, I would try to follow the call chain of what completeInstantiation does and see if anything there would end up looking at the initstage value. Otherwise, I suggest we wait for an answer from Adam. On 2007-09-10, at 14:51 EDT, Philip Romanik wrote: > Hi Tucker, > > The LFC doesn't call completeInstantiation() when initstage=late. > Your concern is valid, but the user must manually call > completeInstantiation() to setup this condition. Depending upon > what Adam says, I think the right solution is to modify > completeInstantiation() to make sure the initstage is reset in all > cases (if it even needs to be set to early). > > Thanks! > > Phil > > > > > >> I'm concerned that: >> >> a) There will now be a complaint that initstage=late changes to >> early, or, >> b) We are missing something as to why the initstage is changed in >> completeInstantiation >> >> What I'd like to know from the original reporter (cc-ed) is if there >> is a problem with the initstage being changed, or if he is just being >> pedantic. >> >> I will ask Adam if he can elaborate on why he changed the initstage >> (and cc you).
