We're producing DocBook, which is xml, not html. This would not work for us
(markdown, that is, not smoking crack).
Benjamin Shine wrote:
Who hooked Tucker up with a crack pipe and the rock?
Tucker, please, for the team, stop smoking crack!
On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:26 PM, P T Withington wrote:
If _I_ ran the zoo, I would propose that we support
[markdown](http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/) in our
source doc comments. Yes, it's another tool in our toolchain, but I
find it a highly legible (and writable) way to mark up your doc
without cluttering it with html.
On 2007-09-19, at 15:10 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote:
Approved. Holy *cow* you're thorough.
Please make another work item to change things that say "_not_" to
good docbook markup -- is that just <em>not</em> in docbook, or is
there another way to express emphasis?
