It's an error unless you only ever plan to make one instance of the
class.
We have discussed having id in a class mean something different from
a global, like global only to the child views of the node or
something, but that has not even been designed.
On 2007-09-25, at 14:55 EDT, John Sundman wrote:
Approved.
One (very minor) nit. It says that putting ID's in class
definitions is not a good idea. Technically, I think it's an
error. It would be interesting to verify that.
Thanks,
jrs
On Sep 25, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Lou Iorio wrote:
From: Lou Iorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 25, 2007 10:47:53 AM EDT
To: John Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Benjamin Shine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: For review: Change 20070925-lou-PdNB5U by lou, IDs vs names
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change 20070925-lou-PdNB5U by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007-09-25
10:31:35 AST
in /home/lou/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: Update to performance chapter of dguide
New Features:
Bugs Fixed: LPP-1048: IDs vs names
Technical Reviewer: Ben Shine
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: John Sundman
Documentation:
Release Notes:
Details: Added the information from the JIRA bug. I pretty much
copied the text as is (I don't know JavaScript).
Tests:
Files:
M docs/src/developers/performance.dbk
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20070925-
lou-PdNB5U.tar
