It's running now, so far so good.
I don't expect a new error since the grammar should
be slightly more permissive now.

- Don

On Dec 10, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Shine wrote:


After making this change, does "ant doc" still work?


On Dec 10, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Donald Anderson wrote:

Change 20071210-dda-l by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007-12-10 16:16:47 EST
    in /Users/dda/laszlo/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
    for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk

Summary: Allow certain new keywords to be identifiers

New Features: none

Bugs Fixed: LPP-5226, LPP-5178

Technical Reviewer: ptw
QA Reviewer: hminsky
Doc Reviewer: (pending)

Documentation: none

Release Notes: none

Details:
New keywords: internal, final, override, dynamic, static can be identifiers. Confirmed with SWF9 third party compiler that these are allowed, and also that
   public/private/protected are not allowed (oddly enough).

Made a common shared function in the grammar to get maximal code sharing.

This change fixes a problem exposed by the addition of the new keywords. We need the keywords to make changes to LFC files that will be shared
   among runtimes.

Tests:
  http://localhost:8080/trunk/examples/components/style_example.lzx
     with SWF7 (the reported test case), also SWF8 and DHTML.
  smokecheck SWF8, DHTML
  Tried some .lzs files mentioned in LPP-5178 to verify that the
     new keywords are still accepted in the appropriate places.

Files:
M      WEB-INF/lps/server/sc/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Parser.jjt

Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20071210- dda-l.tar



--

Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant

Voice:  617-547-7881
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:    http://www.ddanderson.com




--

Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant

Voice:  617-547-7881
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:    http://www.ddanderson.com

Reply via email to