I just checked in a change that should fix that.
On 2007-12-21, at 12:06 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
I'm still seeing super() calls being translated to
(arguments.callee.superclass ?
arguments.callee.superclass.prototype["constructor"] :
this.nextMethod(arguments.callee, "constructor")).call(this);
by the compiler. Can we get rid of the code that's doing this?
public function LzEvent ( eventSender:* , eventName:* , d:* ){
super();
===>
public function LzEvent (eventSender:*, eventName:*, d:*) {
(arguments.callee.superclass ?
arguments.callee.superclass.prototype["constructor"] :
this.nextMethod(arguments.callee, "constructor")).call(this);
On Dec 21, 2007 12:00 PM, Donald Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Approved!
On Dec 21, 2007, at 10:31 AM, P T Withington wrote:
[Henry, if you like I will just check this in for you to try]
Change 20071221-ptw-3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2007-12-21
10:27:38 EST
in /Users/ptw/OpenLaszlo/devildog
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/branches/devildog
Summary: Permit super() calls
Technical Reviewer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pending)
QA Reviewer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pending)
Details:
Tests:
Henry will try it
Files:
M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/
ParseTreePrinter.java
M WEB-INF/lps/server/sc/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Parser.jjt
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20071221-ptw-3.tar
--
Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant
voice: 617-547-7881
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
