OK, I'll try that. I wasn't sure if it was too late at the
"preprocess" phase to have the compiler expand the passthrough pragma.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Donald Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, are you using '#passthrough (toplevel:true) { ' around
> the imports? I would think that would push them right where you need
> them.
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Henry Minsky wrote:
>
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out how to get some "import" statements to get
> > compiled into the little DebugEvaluate class which
> > I'm emitting from the SWF9Generator for evaluating javascript
> > expressions.
> >
> > I'd like to get something like this to appear in the final AS3 output:
> >
> >
> > package {
> >
> >
> > import flash.display.*;
> > import flash.events.*;
> > import flash.utils.*;
> > import flash.text.*;
> > import flash.system.*;
> > import flash.net.*;
> > import flash.ui.*;
> >
> >
> > public class DebugEvaluate extends DebugExec {
> >
> >
> >
> > But I'm not sure if the code that goes in the "preProcess" method
> > takes "LaszloScript" or AS3.
>
> preProcess takes the string that the tag compiler emis (laszloScript)
> and produces the same. For most runtimes, this is the identity
> transformation. But I don't think you really need this if you're
> using #passthrough.
>
>
>
> > How would
> > I squeeze these into the emitted source? In AS3, you can't just try to
> > access some class flash.net.blah at runtime if your
> > haven't 'import'ed it at compile time. I'm trying to import all the
> > stuff that would commonly be used, so people can
> > probe the runtime with their expressions easily.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Henry Minsky
> > Software Architect
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
>
> Don Anderson
> Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant
>
> voice: 617-547-7881
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www: http://www.ddanderson.com
>
>
>
>
>
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
