Phew!
On 2008-02-12, at 16:40 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
Oops, right, the swf9 should be the faster one.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Donald Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henry,
I hope you have the headings reversed - looks like SWF9 takes
longer...
On Feb 12, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Henry Minsky wrote:
So, working around that compiler bug
<canvas width="1000" height="600">
<handler name="oninit">
var i;
i = 1000;
var starttime;
starttime = getTimer();
while (i > 0) {
i--;
new lz.view(canvas, {x: i, y: i});
}
new lz.text(canvas,{x:0, y:20, text: 'elapsed time:
'+getTimer()});
var ctime;
ctime = getTimer() - starttime;
new lz.text(canvas,{x:0, y:30, text: ('initialize new views
time: '+ctime )} );
</handler>
</canvas>
SWF8
total elapsed time 137 msec
creating views: 97 msec
SWF9
total elapsed time 450 msec
creating views: 270 msec
So it looks like a speedup of about three from swf8 to swf9 for view
creation.
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant
voice: 617-547-7881
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
