[Sorry for not responding sooner. This got lost in my inbox while I
was on vacation.]
I'm going to reject this change, given the recent discussion on laszlo-
user about how states should operate. The consensus there seems to be
that if a state provides a new value for an attribute in its parent,
then any parent constraint should be removed when the state is
applied, but that it should _not_ be restored when the state is removed.
If someone really wants to toggle between two different constraints, I
guess they would have to use two states.
On 2008-02-17, at 11:25 EST, André Bargull wrote:
Change 20080217-bargull-4 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008-02-17
17:14:37
in /home/Admin/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: LzState#remove and constraints
New Features:
Bugs Fixed: LPP-5444 - "Now we've got Super-Constraints!"
Technical Reviewer: ptw
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: (pending)
Documentation:
Release Notes:
Details:
When we're re-applying the constraints in LzState#remove(), we must
not call the constraint-methods!
Tests:
Files:
M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/core/LzNode.lzs
M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/helpers/LzState.lzs
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20080217-bargull-4.tar
