Just for the record:
Also see this mail-thread
"http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-dev/2008-May/014606.html";.
Oh I guess there aren't any callers of apply() that are passing an arg to
LzState.apply(), except for one caller in LzState, which looks like it
slipped by accident at some point while we were figuring this out. I will
just modify that to not pass an arg.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:52 PM, P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Are you saying there is a case where someone is making a delegate out of
> these methods? I would say you should make a delegate to a 'wrapper' method
> that handles the argument and then calls the real method. That way you
> don't have to change the signature of the public API.
>
> If you have a specific example, I could elaborate.
>
>
> On 2008-05-08, at 21:26 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
>
> So I know we were discussing the general issue of making methods that are
>> the targets of event sending obey the
>> event protocol and accept an argument, but in the case of 'legacy' public
>> APIs like the LzState apply() and remove methods(),
>> which have been publicly not requiring an argument, should we be giving
>> them
>> an optional "ignore" argument?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Minsky
>> Software Architect
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
-- Henry Minsky Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
