okay, so lets try this.

I guess this will be integrated into the current doctool (
http://wiki.openlaszlo.org/LzxdocTool), or will the process of generating
Documentation change?


sebastian


2008/5/25 David Temkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Note that we are about to add a simple database to the OL distro -- Apache
> Derby -- in order to put LzProject in the distro. That might be a good
> starting point rather than files.
>
> - D.
>
>
> On May 25, 2008, at 6:29 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
>
> maybe its better to store the comments in files instead of a database? That
> way people do not need to set up a database connection for the doc-tool. If
> you redistribute the Docs with the Platform people could run it out of the
> box without configuration.
> You just have to figure out something clever for the naming strategy of
> these files and folders.
> For the iFrame you could take simple velocity-templates and people can
> style them in their needed design.
>
> sebastian
>
> 2008/5/25 Henry Minsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I wonder if we could make a general purpose "doc comment" tool, which is
>> an iframe or something in  each doc page that fetches,displays, and accepts
>> comments. It could store the doc comments in a database, keyed by some
>> keyword from the doc page. That would de-couple it from the doc tools chain,
>> and also potentially make it useful for other applications as well...
>>
>> So for example the doc page for  "datapath" might have this in it,
>> generated by the doc tools
>>
>> <iframe src="doc_comment_page.jsp?key=datapath">
>>
>> and the doc_comment_page.jsp would generate an html page dynamically
>> drawing the comments from something very simple like a file directory
>> tree.
>>
>> There would need to be a simple admin tool to either moderate submitted
>> comments, or else
>> be able to query for recent comments and delete bogus ones.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Sebastian Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> sorry for my late reply,
>>> I think there is no such tool around.
>>> Would it make sense to start such a project (lzx doctool with dynamic
>>> comment extension?!) ?
>>>
>>> sebastian
>>>
>>> 2008/5/22 P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Yes, we'd all like something like this.  People have cited, for instance,
>>>> the way the PHP manual works.
>>>>
>>>> The reference manual is now generated by docbook, so if there is an
>>>> open-source tool that someone knows of that can provide this facility, we'd
>>>> look into it!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2008-05-22, at 08:17 EDT, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I often would like to add some comments to the documentation and I
>>>>> think I'm
>>>>> not the only one. For example if you use a function xy or LzView and
>>>>> see
>>>>> that something is special about it but no comment on it in the
>>>>> reference, it
>>>>> would be helpfull if there is a *add Comment* function next to each
>>>>> Method.
>>>>> Maybe these comments can go into the *main-docs* and reviewed in some
>>>>> kind
>>>>> of cycle.
>>>>> I know that the docs are auto-generated by a tool and it will by some
>>>>> kind
>>>>> of tricky to link comments into it but I think without comments you
>>>>> will
>>>>> loose the *voice of the community* :) and a lot of experience people
>>>>> got who
>>>>> are using it day-by-day.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
>>>>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
>>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Minsky
>> Software Architect
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>


-- 
Sebastian Wagner
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
http://www.laszlo-forum.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to