Approved.
I suspect you did not need the entry in lz for the tag->class because
the interface declaration must put one there. In this sense, LZX
interfaces are not like normal interfaces -- the way they are used
here, and in a binary library, are to declare to the schema that a
class exists, and to declare it's properties. It's processed by a
common path with class though, so it is probably handling the lz
entry. Perhaps that is a bug, but if it is, it would have to be fixed
by fixing the library compiler to output the mapping instead.
On 2008-05-24, at 17:31 EDT, André Bargull wrote:
Change 20080524-bargull-Ash by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008-05-24
21:29:14
in /home/Admin/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
Summary: drawview updated to "lz"-namespace
New Features:
Bugs Fixed: LPP-6042
Technical Reviewer: ptw
QA Reviewer: max
Doc Reviewer: (pending)
Documentation:
Release Notes:
Details:
Updated drawview to use the "lz"-pseudonamespace.
Added entry for dhtml-drawview in "lz", just to comply with the swf-
version, but actually it wasn't necessary, neither for dhtml nor for
swf. Why?
Tests:
Files:
M lps/components/extensions/drawview.lzx
Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20080524-bargull-Ash.tar
