Ouch. I wonder what the compiler is trying to do. I guess we know it
whines about constructor a lot. Maybe saying thing['constructor']
would make it happier?
On 2008-09-11, at 16:34EDT, Henry Minsky wrote:
This code in LzDebug.lzs is causing the flex compiler to get a null
pointer
exception
if (! (indices ?
((thing is Array) && (thing.constructor === Array)) :
((thing is Object) && (thing.constructor ===
Object)))) {
pretty = (! unique);
}
Rewriting it as an "if" statement makes it compile in the flex
compiler.
I reported the compiler error as http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3534
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]