I vote for deferring this, given the complexity of the fix.
On 2008-10-02, at 10:37EDT, Donald Anderson wrote:
Well this is sad - I thought I was going to have plenty of time to
finish this,
but more testing has revealed some flaws - this has happened a few
times now,
I thought I was on the final rewrite. There were some (minor) lfc
source changes needed,
along the way, that may be part of the problem. Anyway, it's
looking like I won't finish this in time
for code freeze today, but I'll keep working on it. It will need a
careful review also - and I want to be
sure in all the tests I run.
It doesn't feel like a 'critical' bug to me, let me know if I'm
wrong. If I should be working on
something else instead in the meantime, let me know also.
- Don
--
Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant
voice: 617-547-7881
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com
