Hi Lou, I would appreciate it if you would still remain as the default assignment so that you can perform the initial validation. You know the docs better than anyone, and for each bug filed, we need to validate it and then reassign it appropriately. Once validated, it would also be hepful if you could assign a priority. Then, reassign them all to me.
We can certainly change the components and their naming - since Doc Tools was selected because we were re-doing the doc tools to generate the Ref Guide. I'm not sure that component name was ever obvious to users when filing bugs. Would appreciate your suggestions on this as well. --- Amy On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Lou Iorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Amy, > > As far as I understand, doc bugs should be filed in one of two places: > > Documentation: all dguide issues > Doc Tools: all reference guide issues > > Some people are filing bugs as Documentation - RefGuide, which, from > their point of view makes perfect sense, but these are getting assigned to > me, which doesn't make sense. These should be assigned to developers. > > Is there any legitimate reason for bugs to be filed as Documentation - > RefGuide? > Should Documentation - RefGuide just go away, and existing open bugs be > moved to Doc Tools? If not, the default assignment should be to someone > other > than me. > > Thanks, > > Lou >
