Yes, it works in that it compiles and gives the result:

  DEBUG: bar: 42
  ERROR @LPP-7514b.lzx#17: ReferenceError: Error #1065

(tested with catcherrors set to true).

How should we proceed?

- Don

On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:23 PM, P T Withington wrote:

There's still going to be some corner case though, that I am not sure we have thought out:

When the tag compiler compiles an LZX class, _sometimes_ it has to write a method as a closure, in which case it outputs:

 var meth = function (...) { #pragma withThis ... }

and in that case, it really wants a `with (this)` emitted in that function body (which means you need it in your try closure too).

Does the current mechanism do the right thing? Here's a simple test case:

<canvas debug="true">
 <class name="foo">
   <attribute name="bar" value="42" />
   <state applied="true">
     <method name="doit">
       Debug.debug("bar: %#w", bar);
     </method>
     <method name="dontit">
       Debug.debug("bar: %#w", bletch);
     </method>
   </state>
   <handler name="oninit">
     doit();
     // Should cause a caught error
     dontit();
   </handler>
 </class>

 <foo />

</canvas>

On 2009-01-09, at 11:48EST, Donald Anderson wrote:

Oh, right, that would have been a lot easier.
I'll make a new changeset.

On Jan 9, 2009, at 11:02 AM, P T Withington wrote:

Shouldn't it be sufficient to simply use the same flag you use to ignore the withThis pragma for js2 to conditionalize emitting the `with (this)` in your try closure? (I think you use the `remaplocals()` predicate, but maybe that should be renamed `isjs2()`?

On 2009-01-09, at 09:44EST, Donald Anderson wrote:

Change 20090108-dda-O by [email protected] on 2009-01-08 06:25:08 EST
in /Users/dda/laszlo/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk-c
for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk

Summary: Remove references to 'this' in static functions (revised)

New Features:

Bugs Fixed: LPP-7514 (Compilation error when setting compiler.swf9.catcherrors=true in lps.properties)

Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
QA Reviewer: (pending)
Doc Reviewer: (pending)

Documentation:

Release Notes:

Details:
[This changeset revises an earlier one sent to review, fixing an ugly workaround. Everything indicated under Tests has been retested with this revision.]

The implementation of catchFunctionExceptions (catcherrors) was blind to static functions,
'this' cannot be used in static functions.

To tell that a function is static, this changeset peeks up the tree to the parent of the function node, which should be a ASTModifiedDefinition ('moddef'), and checks the static flag there. A shortcut in copying part of the tree without the moddef needed to be fixed, to do that, a 'shallow copy' function was added to the moddef class.

An alternate way of detecting static-ness is to set a 'static' property in the options. I had tried in addressing LPP-5813 (not yet completed), and had some trouble getting it to work. It's not clear which one is cleaner, but the one that works wins for me.

This fix is slightly more encompassing than it needs to be, it also disables any possibility of applying the WITH_THIS directive within a static function. This should always be correct. Changing that to be narrower did not affect the SWF8 problem.


Tests:
(dhtml,swf8,swf9) x (lzpix,weather,smokecheck,hello) x (enable catcherrors, disable catcherrors)

Files:
M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/ JavascriptGenerator.java M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/ CommonGenerator.java
M      WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/CodeGenerator.java
M WEB-INF/lps/server/sc/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/parser/ ASTModifiedDefinition.java

Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20090108-dda-O.tar



--

Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant

voice: 617-306-2057
email: [email protected]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com








--

Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant

voice: 617-306-2057
email: [email protected]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com








--

Don Anderson
Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant

voice: 617-306-2057
email: [email protected]
www: http://www.ddanderson.com





Reply via email to