Another improvement suggestion for the doc system: Somehow verify
email addresses, either the standard 'type twice' or something...
And, we still plan on making it so I can tell why I rejected a comment
using a web form?
Maybe we should allow rejected comments to display for some length of
time, with the rejection reason?
Begin forwarded message:
From: P T Withington <[email protected]>
Date: 13 April 2009 15:24:15.000 EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OpenLaszlo doc comment for review: 1239648953
[Guess we should also make people type their email twice. I bet
your email address is not 'gamil.com'.]
Thanks for your comment, but I have to reject it because it is in
fact a bug. Please file a bug at jira.openlaszlo.org.
Author: Suzie
Email: [email protected]
Is the following statement from above in Section 6.1 correct, or
was it a victim of search and replace over zealousness?
"In earlier versions of LZX (before OpenLaszlo 4), there was an
asymmetric mapping between tag and class names, often of the form
LzFoo <—> <foo>, as in the correspondence between, say the class
name lz.view and the tag name <view>. (Notice in lz.view the mixed
case, and the absence of the period between lz and the tag name.)
Also there was a distinction between LFC classes and user-created
classes. The new lz.foo form is consistent across LFC classes ...."
Should the parenthetical statement read:
"(Notice in lzView the mixed case, and the absence of the period
between lz and the tag name.)"
Personally, I think this is far more detail than is needed. Why
document the old system, which was simply confusing. The new system
is straight-forward. If there is a tag named <foo>, the class that
implements it is named `lz.foo`, for all tags.
