I tried an app with 5000 views, as tags inline, and I don't see any
significant change reported by the inittimer before or after this change.


On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Henry Minsky <[email protected]>wrote:

> The calls to new won't be getting queued I believe. I'll try a test case
> which just has lots of <view> tags inline.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Max Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm I can't seem to prove that makes any difference.  This is probably
>> because we're not doing instantiation across multiple frames - at least this
>> shows no change in swf9:
>>
>> <canvas>
>>    <view id="foo">
>>        <handler name="onconstruct">
>>            for (var i = 0; 10000 > i; i++) {
>>                new lz.view(this, {x:i, y:i, width:100, height: 100,
>> bgcolor: 'red'});
>>            }
>>        </handler>
>>    </view>
>>    <inittimer/>
>> </canvas>
>>
>>
>>
>> Max Carlson wrote:
>>
>>> Change 20090430-maxcarlson-I by maxcarl...@bank on 2009-04-30 15:28:22
>>> PDT
>>>   in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean
>>>   for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>>>
>>> Summary: Raise framerate during app initialization
>>>
>>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8136 - Set the framerate to 1000 during app
>>> initialization
>>>
>>> Technical Reviewer: ptw
>>> QA Reviewer: hminsky
>>>
>>> Details: framerate setter caches any values during init, setting the
>>> framerate to 1000.  init() sets the framerate back to the cached value.
>>>  Move onafterinit event sending to the end of init() so it can be used to
>>> turn profiling back on.
>>>
>>> Tests: Startup should be slightly faster in DHTML and SWF9, where the
>>> framerate can be set dynamically
>>>
>>> Files:
>>> M      WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LaszloCanvas.lzs
>>>
>>> Changeset:
>>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20090430-maxcarlson-I.tar
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Max Carlson
>> OpenLaszlo.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [email protected]
>
>
>


-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[email protected]

Reply via email to