In case anyone was wondering, I'm available for hire. I will simply delegate
my housekeeping
duties.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Amy Muntz <[email protected]>wrote:

> Well, it would also help if we had a doc person tracking this stuff and
> writing the Release Notes ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Henry Minsky <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> mea culpa?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:44 PM, P T Withington 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> It's the only one I am aware of having been promoted.
>>>
>>> It's also been made much spiffier and more efficient, which is how it
>>> earned its promotion.  :)
>>>
>>> I guess we _forgot_ about putting it in the release notes.  Perhaps
>>> because someone forgot to file a Jira improvement to record this great idea?
>>>
>>> On 2010-02-22, at 18:48, Antun Karlovac wrote:
>>>
>>> > This is awesome! Out of curiosity, does know how many other components
>>> have been promoted from incubator, to the rather more distinguished "lz"
>>> pool so far?
>>> >
>>> > However, this change appears to have made it into 4.7.1, without the
>>> release notes acknowledging tooltip's successful career move. It would
>>> certainly be nice for fans of tooltip to be made aware of this change, so
>>> they could address tooltip by his new title henceforth.
>>> >
>>> > Also, there's a bug with the auto-include for tooltip: LPP-8785
>>> >
>>> > -Antun
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 1/26/10 7:32 PM, Henry Minsky wrote:
>>> >> So I'd like to  use the tooltip code in the debugger, and would thus
>>> >> like move the code that's in incubator/tooltip/* to the lz/components
>>> >> directory.
>>> >>
>>> >> Should
>>> >> I just do this? It would be nice to be able to assume that anyone
>>> who's
>>> >> using components from the incubator
>>> >>  in their app is not depending on finding them there permanently...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Henry Minsky
>>> >> Software Architect
>>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Minsky
>> Software Architect
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to