They're going to get it, sooner or later... On 2010-07-20, at 14:41, Max Carlson wrote:
> Sure - tell it to Hollywood! > > Regards, > Max Carlson > OpenLaszlo.org > > On 7/20/10 11:39 AM, P T Withington wrote: >> Yeah, but haven't you heard? DRM is dead: >> >> http://jolt.richmond.edu/v16i4/article14.pdf >> >> On 2010-07-20, at 14:21, Max Carlson wrote: >> >>> Also... Only Flash has DRM! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Max Carlson >>> OpenLaszlo.org >>> >>> On 7/20/10 8:07 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>>> On 2010-07-20, at 09:26, Raju Bitter wrote: >>>> >>>>> Read more here: >>>>> http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/06/flash-and-html5-tag.html >>>> >>>> What's left out is any discussion of the difference between Flash's >>>> security policy (by default, open access to your hardware, granted because >>>> you intentionally installed their plug-in), and most browser's security >>>> policy (by default, _no_ access to your hardware, because there's no >>>> telling where the Javascript on that web page has been). >>>> >>>> Once you recognize that distinction, most of the other differences just >>>> fall out. It's not clear at all that Flash can keep up that default >>>> policy. At least one major vendor refuses to deploy Flash on its >>>> platforms, in part because of that default policy. >>
