In fact, it surprised me that the compiler would not complain if it saw both a text attribute _and_ non-LZX content in a tag that supports text.
On 2010-09-14, at 10:07, Henry Minsky wrote: > That sounds like a good heuristic > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:18 PM, P T Withington > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> At least in this particular case, it's interesting that the programmer >> explicitly said `text=""` in the open tag. I think we could say that if you >> explicitly assign the text attribute, whether in the open tag as is done >> here, or as an explicit attribute tag, then the compiler should _not_ try to >> interpret the body of the tag as the text value. That would seem to give an >> easy out for the case where you want to make a one-off text instance with >> methods -- you just specify the content as the initial value of the text >> attribute instead. >> >> How does that sound?
