Thoughts for the "Structure" category ... how about "Framework"?
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Lou Iorio <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm about to add new reference pages for <class> and <passthrough>. > > It seems like these should go in the "Structure" category in the TOC, > but that has become sort of a catch all for items that don't have a > more obvious category. Right now, the Structure category looks like > this: > > Structure > * <attribute> > * <handler> > * <event> > * <canvas> > * <import> > * <include> > * <library> > * <mixin> > * <splash> > * <splash view> > * <contextmenu> > * <contextmenuitem> > > You can see the entire TOC here<http://www.louiorio.com/openlaszlo/toc.html> > . > > Items can appear in more than one category (for example, <event> is in > both the Structure and Events categories). > > Any ideas for a better organization? Better name for Structure? > >
