15.12.2010 0:20, Rami Ojares kirjoitti:
And I think what you are aiming at is not just one possible
representation but
the canonical string representation of the value.
This remark was bs.
Because clearly the type imlementor can support many different strings
to represent the same value.
So you were talking about a possible string representation of a value.
The point being that this representation is always of type string.
So another name candidate for the attribute name could be "stringvalue".
That clearly states the difference to value which can be also some other
type than string.
- rami
